That sounds like geometry in round brilliant cut symmetry, how if we go backwards in terms of triangular architectures as the derivative origin, we can interpret in a this standard sequence that the finished octagonal table facet was quadruply halved, and out pops one isoceles triangular facet edge along each edge of the table facet, turning on slight surface brilliance reflective sheer on each flat faceted shaped pointing outwardly on to symettrically pattern the beginning of the overall rounding effect to be achieved in several layers. The start of the first step accentuates broadly into weaving geometries to occur by setting this out as an opening to the latter steps of the crown facets, downward slight curvature to outerlope a dome. --- We know that the second harmonic layer will start from the first harmonic layer of the exposed angles of each isoceles triangle at where they conceptually give a grounded footing as they spread from the table, almost as gravity would agree in which it would hold stability in a lifelike orthagonal to stay upright if these were built from a deck of cards which was mathematically proportional shapes of facets rather than rectangular deck. The inward slope toward the table would ensure the stability interpreted by each phase of integrity symbolically actualizing the reality of a mystery we will determine at the end of the derivation depending on the variation we integrate to acheive identity of the proportions. Once the points have been determined on the footing is stably held by the table's format. We will ingest the sparsity into the degree by which it has any right to assume symmetrical centricity. We will need to slant it out as a derivation from the table, using the same formula with a divisor of double sin to determine it is equally respondent. While each stratified occurance is symbol in shape convenience when we observe the light behavior does in fact cohere within a watch-like distance if interbed in a watch-like setting. But for this clean pure symmetrical layered pattern we would see the appearance would perfectly shape an optical congruence of perceived brilliance. Thus the incremeneted slighting sits in the partially slighted threshold just between where the object's axis point of distal coherence appears further and smaller away, we retain this gradient alignment in multiple metrological standards of measure along the second harmony. --- We will wrap this up into a card bed, if we were to demonstrate the dimensional reality of a flattened plane of the base underneath a hollow sprawled out structure of two orders of harmonic coherence interventively. Assuming a non-gravity environment, or a fragment of space-time while we pause to manage the proportions of the third order which will actively maintain a collapsed inverse infinity triangle. A sequenced florentiner ends this ring of settlement to the orthagonal sequenced dish bracket can be seen thinly underneath the exterior perimeter boundary of the now 12 cross sectional fragments or dare I say 60 so we can properly refactor it not unwillingly, but by divine trend. We can bisectionaly alternate each cardinal prime intersect axes. We need to bisect the clock first beyond which a traditional face has concept in appropriate formality. This may allow predestination to unfold intersectingly when we can plot the ridging with confidence rather than populating using some sort of development. The attainment shall derive in the perimiter exterior acidity level unnegotiable of a daffodil to a crocus. We will trisect each axis octagonal cardinal bisectors for a retributable meaning to splice the octopede based system in the equatively restored union by calculation. ID will refer to the inner diameter by core reference of the table's ray on axis of reflection which will terminate eachother upon the origins of each symmetrical ray from the beginning of each cut become congruently in which the lengths they are intersected. This will serve as a reflection of a sectional length from any bisectional halve on the "inner diameter" of the table when viewing the "outer diameter" as the circumferencial exterior of the disc. We may need to use this formula for the correct conformity for the correctly proportional independent angle variable by derivational projection using cube root square root of 4(ID/2) * ((2sin)/coscos). How is this conforming if we reach the original plane placed in the equation for reference? Can we unpause the time variable safely? --- so we got to the girdle? --- I did it! I have been orthagonally placed in this plane and we need to circumventially rest at this point, for our purpose. The accretion has been derived. --- well we don't have to worry about the cards anymore.. wait... if they were panels instead then we can double the amount of faces. 1 table which can be removed now it is stable with the orders, thus the unpausing was safe. 8 stars and 16 steps with the underlying rooted thorns. we fucked up. We miscalculated the 12. --- I am used to the octagonal steps with 8 stars, 16 mids, then equally conforming from the open edges with each of the 8 triangular points injected so that there is a flat grounded edge of symmetrical isoceles rounding the edge cleanly to the girdle planted firmly with the light influence in mind wholly grounded in solidity and sharpness with a polished underlighting surrounded orient encapsulation of sheen allowing the tilted orientation breadth to spatially agree in timespace from a perspective viewpoint space in a way which is fit for any lighting condition to posture. But this will not attribute the same behavior without the pavillion. We will assume 60.5 to 60.7 depth percentage to diameter proportion, for this example we will average out at 60.6 percent depth. if it goes above 61 percent it has a eerie feeling when I see the numbers, and am ascertain it is off if it goes upward toward 62 percent. For diameter of 66kkm we will have a girdle of 1.34%. Then the kite faceted scalene triangle with bisected inwardly folding right triangles. We know the pythagorean theorem will be equalized and constant to describe each of the 12 kited facets which will be plotted as the hypotenuses outwardly singularly facing which ascribe across the elongated "lozenge" shaped "diamonds"(4 sided facets) which tilt inwardly into the culet of a 1.2063% diameter as ascribed in symmetrical ratio to the girdle thickness. We can derive all the other values now here from deducing the percentage ratios which for the table should remain about 57.4% of "inner diameter" of the absolute diameter parametric which we know is 66kkm or 66 million meters. --- that would be too risky and would not hold hence that of which essence a full foundational mathematical injunctive holds to serve. We may instill it for later use.